Convergent Series for Riemann’s Hypothesis

Riemann’s hypothesis affirms that the existence of zeros for zed function have as the royal part (a = 12 ) as the only solution. In this article I analyzed and in turn demonstrates the existence of infinitys royal numbers for his royal part. To define all zeros, we will apply the method of progressive substitution.


Introduction
Riemann's hypothesis has mathematical relevancy by believe that we would determine the prime numbers that exist between (n) and (n + 1). The equation where Legendre and Gauss surmised that (Li(n) = ∫ b a dx lnx ) it is verified that has big mistakes when we increase the value of (n). In this article we observe because this happens, across the convergent respective series ( proposition 2). I believe that the simplicity of these series is the motive by which nobody investigate them. I say this because it is in what I have deepened my investigation. S. Haran [1], E.C. Tilchmarst [2], A.M. Odlyzro [3], T.M. Aposto [4]; after a long period of analysis and not have positive resulrs; I decide to return to the additive numbers theory [5].

Mains results
In is work I expose and develop the way to continuing for Riemann's hypothesis in the form.
the convergent series are correct for (s = 1); it is demonstrated in the proposition (2). I initiate with the axioma: method of progressive substitution That's to say A + B = C if B = D + E; then A + D + E = C in its turn: E = F + G we have that.
A + D + F + G = C Proposition 1: If we apply this to the entire numbers we will have factorized of addends the number (C). For it we will do the following.
( C 2 = a) for C = even; and ( C 2 = a, m) ; for C = odd. wit which: C = (a − 1) + (a + 1) or C = (a ′ ) + (a ′ + 1), in both cases we keep the value fixed of (a − 1) or (a ′ ) and factorized the value of a+1 2 = b of the following form. Saying this, we go on to the interesting of the article. Proposition 2: method of progressive substitution in the fraction. If we have that 1 b + 1 c = 1 d and we want to increase addend and to have the same root 1 d then we will do the following. We take the major denominator (b < c) we factorize (c), example c = 3 · 2 and later we increase to each of factors and to his product a unit (2+1, 3+1, 6+1), now we multiply each of these values for (c); c(2 + 1); c(3 + 1), c(6 + 1).
Later we subtract to the value of 1 c each of the previous; it is to say.
We take the three addends of (1/c) and we replace them in the equation 1 b + 1 c = 1 d we will have the beginning of the progression.
I will do the demonstration for example with the progression (2) .

Convergent Series for Riemann's Hypothesis
In the beginning of the progression we have that: If we say that 1 d = 1 2 then (c = 2b) and therefore.
We remember that (x) is one of the factors of (c(2 + 1)) and for this case (2b(2 + 1) = 18); 18 = 6 · 3 with which. x = 3 and therefore. 1 We have definite all the values to replace them in the equation.

Conclussion
The values of ( 1 c = 1 d.b ) demonstrate that (a = 1 2 ) is not the only royal number in the Riemann's zed function; also it is (a = 1 3 ; 1 4 ; 1 5 ; ............). If we apply in the proposition (2) each of the values we will have his respective series. All zero of the zed function is on line.